Every coaches on investigation have been authoritative Enneagram coaches regarding the Narrative Traditions. New Enneagram Intensive training Courses used five pri particular boards, (2) didactic reading, (3) meditation knowledge, and (4) experiential exploration. Enneagram Intensive Courses instructors used a plan named This new Enneagram Intense®: Partnering Emotional Existence and you may Spirit.
The three Introductory classes provided pri studying methods. This new Berkeley movement incorporated casual Enneagram method of panels and you will didactic reading. The fresh Minnesota direction used all of one’s first studying modalities. Brand new Palo Alto movement used Enneagram variety of panels, didactic reading, and you can experiential mining such as for instance guided visualization.
Questionnaires was in fact published because of the a study secretary and you can taken to a good Cook-Greuter-formal SCT scorer (Hy and you may Loevinger 1996) through post send. Password number were used so that the rater is blind to the sort of try, brand new times of the shot, additionally the degree category sort of. The scorer observed the education by Susan Create-Greuter, utilizing the brand spanking new Loevinger guidelines, with the https://datingranking.net/caribbean-cupid-review/ exception of stems beyond the tips guide (Cook-Greuter 1999). Scored responses was repaid towards boffins in a stand out bequeath piece which had been after that useful for investigation studies. To ensure reliability of the rating to possess leads to and that players went right up or off a couple of stages, an example of these studies was also scored by Create-Greuter by herself.
An analysis of variance (ANOVA) confirmed that there were no pre-existing ego development differences at baseline among the participants between the sites, F(8, 9) = 0.38, p = .93. The pretest and posttest ego development scores were significantly correlated (r = .48, p < .001), whereby participants with higher pre-training scores also had higher post-training scores.
Since there are significantly more older than more youthful people contained in this take to, an analysis are used to test the relationship ranging from age bracket and you may knowledge effect. In total, 40 members (33%, letter = ) increased no less than one amount following degree. Proportionally, much more 50–59 season olds (45%, n = ) compared to the most other a long time improved one or more values just after the education (20%, n = 1/5, lower than 29; 0%, n = 0/step 3, 30–39 season olds; 25%, letter = 7/twenty eight, 40–forty-two 12 months olds; and you can twenty-four%, letter = 8/33, 60+ season olds). To examine if or not it pattern is statistically high, a beneficial ? 2 try out of independence was determined by researching decades category and you can whether or not a person knowledgeable ego phase development of that or higher stages adopting the input (or perhaps not).
An analysis has also been conducted to evaluate the partnership ranging from new member gender and you can training feeling. Whether or not proportionally, way more ladies (36%, letter = ) than guys (18%, letter = 4/22) advanced one or more degrees pursuing the degree, an effective ? dos take to regarding freedom shown no relationships anywhere between sex and you can ego creativity.
Two repeated-measures ANOVAs were conducted to test for within-subject ego development changes across the training sites. The first model examined the interaction term of ego development by training site type as a dichotomous variable (intensive site vs. introductory site); the model was not significant at the p < .05 level, F(1,120) = 1.32, p = .25. The second model examined the interaction term of ego development by individual training site; the model was also not significant at the p < .05 level, F(7, 114) = 1.40, p = .21.
Paired sample t tests were conducted to examine whether there were significant changes in ego development scores before compared to after the Enneagram training interventions at each site. Data revealed that the Asheville 2005 participant group showed a significant increase in ego development scores following the intervention, t(22) = ? 3.36, p < .01. Table 4 sument scores and the paired t test results.